Based in Derbyshire, we provide an efficient McKenzie Friend service.
A McKenzie Friend can be a professional or a layperson. They do not need to have legal qualifications, although some may have legal training or experience. The essential requirement is that they are trusted by the litigant and able to provide the necessary support.
While the litigant has a right to have a McKenzie Friend, the court's permission is still required. Typically, courts are supportive of this arrangement as long as the McKenzie Friend adheres to the rules and does not disrupt the proceedings.
In family law cases, a McKenzie Friend might help a parent during custody hearings by providing support and helping to present their case. In small claims court, they might assist a litigant in organizing evidence and understanding procedural requirements.
Before appointing anyone to support you in the courts do some due diligence!! The main (valid) reason against using a McKenzie Friend (MF), is that they are not required to have any training or qualifications and are not regulated.
My name is Tim Greenslade I graduated from The Open University in 2007 with a Bachelor of Science (Honours) in Psychology, whilst working with looked after children in residential settings. I qualified as a Social Worker, graduating from the University of Nottingham in 2010 with a Post Graduate Diploma in Social Work Studies. I have gained significant experience of working with children and families, with numerous local authorities, including at management level. I have extensive experience as a Social Worker in the court arena (full CV attached below). I am registered with Social Work England (SWE), I can be found on the SWE register - SW25768. I am also a member of the British Association of Social Workers (BASW).
I act as a MF as a part of my paid working week as an Independent Social Worker. My other main area of work is as an 'associate' for CAFCASS and NYAS. In these roles I act as a Guardian for children in public and private law cases (referred to as a Family Court Advisor (FCA) in private law). The role of a FCA should be of interest to you if you are considering me as a MF. In short I regularly write Section 7 reports to assist the court with their decisions. My work ensures I understand and adhere to what the court is attempting to achieve. I regularly appoint solicitors (in public law cases) and work alongside them in court. As such, I have access to knowledge on complex points of law and the working practices of family law Solicitors.
My area of expertise is navigating the court process in relation to the living and contact arrangements for children, after the separation of their parents. See further factual information regarding me and the role of a MF in the downloads section below.
If you are involved in private proceedings you have three main options regarding your representation in court:
The obvious restriction of using a Solicitor is cost , you have possibly done some enquiries. It is no secret that their representation in a straight forward case can run to tens of thousands of pounds.
A less obvious downside to a Solicitor is the approach they will use. They will represent you as their 'client', they will consider your needs over and above your child. This contradicts the primary aim of the court, which is to resolve the issue in the best interests of the child. Such an approach is likely to result in delays in the proceedings. This adds to the emotional impact on all family members. It also comes at a higher financial cost to the 'client'. Solicitor's have no duty of care to the child. My approach puts the child at the centre of any decisions. If I feel your applications is unrealistic, I will tell you at the earliest opportunity. I also do not want to facilitate any acrimony between the parents, as that is not the basis to establish healthy family relationships for the child.
The main benefits to using a Solicitor is that they are trained in law and are regulated. On that basis a Solicitor can deal directly with other parties, assist you with statements and speak on your behalf in court. This can also include cross examining other parties in contested hearings. My experience of Solicitors is that they are knowledgeable, astute and 100% comfortable in the court environment. Nevertheless, you do not require to appoint one to successfully navigate private proceedings. Remember, the judge makes the final decisions, this is based on the evidence placed before them and ultimately what they perceive to be in the best interests of the child.
If you choose to use a MF, you have to accept they are limited to what tasks they can carry out, when compared to a solicitor. However, they can ease the stress of the court process and should be able to support you to prepare a cogent and equitable position, at a fraction of the cost of a Solicitor. Due to the nature of MF's you need to know on what basis they are offering their services. Consider their background and how they have gained their court experience. If they are merely offering emotional/moral support, you may be better taking an unpaid friend or relative.